|
Home Up Prior Products - no longer available Documents Book Modulation Loads Lattice Crystal Filter IMD Measurements Using LP100 Coupler Prototyping Software Updates K2 Measurements Oscillator Noise Measurements Bypassing Capacitor Voltage Change K2 Freq Stability Cohn Crystal Filter Receiver AGC Curves K2 RX Sensitivity Canned Osc Phase Noise K2 Interface K2 Filter Surface Mount Assembly TL750L Low Dropout Regulator Swordfish DDS Swordfish GLCD Module Bessel Nulls AM Modulation Z10000 with FT-920 Z100 Tuning Aid Dayton 2007 Softrock Lite 6.2 Header Adapter Carbon Composition Resistors Thermometers Hakko FT-800 Thermal Wire Stripper Heat Sinks Diode Turn-On Time Bill Hewlett and his Magic Lamp Tektronix P6022 Current Probe 1N400x Diode Family Forward Voltage Temperature Chamber Diode Vf vs If Ferrite Transformers 6 dB Hybrid Combiner Type 43 Ferrite B-H Curve K3 IF Bandpass Filter Estimating Q of Ferrite Cores Z10000 Buffer Amp Z10010 Bandpass Filter Using Softrock as a Panadapter for the K2 Signal Generator Phase Noise & Elecraft K2 Audio Transformer Data and Modeling Measuring 60 Hz Frequency Compact Fluorescent Lamp Z10000-U Buffer Amp and FT-1000MP WJ-8617B Receiver Impressions Weather in Clifton VA Radio Intelligence Example Diodes for RF Probes PIC Development Boards and Programmers Elecraft K3 and Panadapters Elecraft K3 AGC and S-Meter Elecraft K3 Noise Blanker and Crystal/DSP Filtering Jackson Harbor Press VLF Converter Elecraft K3 Receive Audio Headphone Impedance Non-Linear Transformer Behavior Off-the-air Frequency Measurement Easy Broadband Transformer Norton Amplifier Signal Levels EZGPIB and Prologix GPIB Adapter Signal Statistics FM & TV Subcarriers
| |
|
31 August 2006
I've completed measuring my K2's performance "before and after" installing
the most recent IF buffer amplifier. I've posted a brief summary of the test
methodology and a sample before and after photo at a new web page,
K2 Measurements. I found no significant
differences after installing the buffer amplifier.
In the next day or two, I'll also update the K2 Interface page to show the
most recent board and cable installation, and to discuss BFO leakage issues. |
|
|
29 August 2006
[Latest 29 August 2006. I've made some performance
measurements of my K2, but all I've had a chance to post are the transmitter
intermodulation distortion data. This shows a practical application of the
Z90/Z91, by the way. The data can be seen by clicking on this link:
K2/100 IMD Measurements.
My K2 has arrived at the local FedEx distribution
center, so I should receive it sometime today.
I've made measurements of the typical output spectrum
from the Z90's auxiliary signal generator output port, and also the Z90's signal
input port. I also had an opportunity to examine the audio output versus signal
level input for my Racal RA6790/GM receiver with AGC enabled.
|
Here is the typical stray leakage out of the Z90's input
port, when set for a center frequency of 4915 KHz.
The strong pip at the left is 0 MHz (in other words, it's
not a real signal; it's the spectrum analyzer's LO.). The strongest leakage
signal is at approximately 26 MHz, at -78 dBm. This is the second harmonic of
the Z90's local oscillator. -78 dBm corresponds to 28 uV in 50 ohms.
|
 |
|
|
Here's a typical auxiliary signal generator output
spectrum view. The Z90 is set to signal generator mode at 10.000 MHz.
The worst harmonic output is approximately -35 dB below
the fundamental.
|
 |
|
|
|
The purpose of automatic gain control (AGC) is to maintain
the audio output at a relatively constant level as the signal input changes
strength and to prevent overloading the receiver's gain stages.
In order to improve signal to noise ratio, it's common for
AGC to be "delayed" or to allow the receiver to operate at maximum gain up to a
certain, defined, input signal level. At that threshold point, AGC is applied
and maintains the audio output more or less constant over a wide range of signal
input.
AGC operation is often tested by plotting audio output
versus RF input signal level. Rather than manually stepping a signal generator
though a variety of levels and recording the audio output, I automated the
process with a simple Liberty Basic program to control my Panasonic VP8191
signal generator via an IEEE-488 (GPIB) interface and to read the receiver's
audio output with my Fluke 189 digital multimeter over an RS-232 interface. The
computer program then saved the RF signal generator level and resulting audio
output level to a disk file for later analysis and plotting.
I set the receiver to 14.025 MHz, CW mode, 300 Hz
bandwidth, AGC = On, fast attack/decay, AGC threshold = default. |
|
|
|
Setup for automated AGC test
|
 |
|
|
Resulting data. AGC threshold is at -110 dBm.
Over the range -110 dBm - +10 dBm, output is
essentially unchanged.
|
 |
|
The Racal RA6790/GM allows the user to set the AGC
threshold point via a front panel adjustment, and -110 dBm is the default
setting, which I find adequate for normal use. |
|
|
|
24 August 2006
My K2 has been shipped, and should be in my hands
Tuesday the 29th. Frank, W6NEK, received the replacement LCD diffuser assembly
from Elecraft and has fitted it in place. I'm looking forward to receiving the
K2 for both testing with the Z90 but also to make some real contacts with. It
will likely reside in the basement shop area, but my antenna feedlines are
accessible from the shop area through a jumper panel.
I've also received the second revision to the K2
interface PCB and should be able to assemble one later today. Assuming no errors
in the layout--or at least no errors that can't be fixed with an X-Acto knife
and jumper wires!--I'll send a kit to Stan for an independent assembly and test
in his K2.
I've also had time to add the call sign customization
hooks in the Z90 firmware and in the Z90-Display software. This allows you to
enter your callsign (maximum 10 characters) into the Z90 (or Z91) EEPROM memory.
Thereafter, whenever you power up the Z90, your callsign will be displayed on
the LCD, and for both the Z90 and Z91, when used with the Z90-Display software,
your callsign will appear at the upper left of the graticule.
Still on my "to do" list is a button or check-box to
reverse the scan sense. That is a bit more complicated, as the Z90 LCD display
routines are only distantly related to the Z90-Control windows software. But, it
will be done.
|
|
The new Enter Callsign Dialog box. It needs a bit more
work to balance the vertical and horizontal space, of course.
|
 |
|
|
|
I've also revised the Z90-Control software by deleting
the callsign box I had added a few days ago as a temporary measure. I've kept
the ability to enter a title.
|
 |
|
|
|
23 August 2006
I ordered the longest lead time items today, the front and
rear panels for the Z90 and Z91. Delivery time is estimated at 50 days,
consistent with my planned October shipment date. My supplier quotes the
delivery quantity as +/- 4 units. I've ordered enough panels to meet the order
requirements assuming the shipped quantity is -4 units, so if the actual
delivery is +4, I can fill a few more orders. Hence, if you missed the original
cutoff date, there's still a fairly good chance that I can accommodate a few
more purchasers.
The panel color is gray, with white lettering (red for
cautions). |
|
The Z90 front and rear panels in a 3-D view. (The color
used in the image is not the actual panel color.)
|
 |
|
I've also sent off a final prototype DDS board to
my assembler for an independent test.
It looks as if I won't receive my K2 until early next
week, as Frank, W6NEK, has not yet received the replacement part from Elecraft. |
|
|
|
22 August 2006
The order window closed Friday, 18 August. I plan to
place the cabinet orders tomorrow and will order enough front and rear panels to
meet the orders in hand as of tomorrow morning, a few extras for spares plus
ones I will use in my shack. My supplier quotes the volume as "+ or - 2" so to
ensure that I have enough on hand, I will order front and rear panels to meet
the current order list assuming the delivery is -2 of the ordered quantity., If
it's on the +2 side, I may well have enough parts to provide a few extra kits.
So, I'll accept orders for the next couple of weeks on a contingent basis, with
the contingency being enough extra parts being delivered to me by the supplier
and receiving the orders in the next two or three weeks, at which time I must
order some expensive electronic components.
I've reconsidered the color scheme and am now leaning
toward black cabinet covers with gray front/rear panels, white lettering (and
red lettering on the rear for the caution warnings). I'll make a final color
decision tomorrow morning but that's where I', heading now. |
|
|
|
17 August 2006
Reminder - the Z90/Z91 order window closes Friday,
18 August 2006.
I've made a few changes to the Z90-Control software. |
|
The revised software provides for a user-entered title line and also
displays the user's callsign and the current date and time. This makes the
image more self-documenting.
|
 |
|
At the moment, the user's callsign must be entered every time the
software is launched, but the next Z90 firmware revision will add the necessary
hooks permitting the Windows software to read callsign information from the
Z90's EEPROM and to write a changed callsign to its EEPROM. |
|
|
|
I've also had an interesting discussion with a Scottish ham concerning signal
levels on the 40 meter band. His measurements show that 7 MHz shortwave
broadcast signal levels can easily reach 0 dBm or stronger with even a modest
wire antenna. A contest-level station might see signal levels well over +15 dBm.
To obtain a sense of signal levels on the east coast of the US, near
Washington DC, I connected my HP8558B spectrum analyzer to my main HF antenna.
It's an M2 "skip band" log periodic, with coverage of 7.0 - 7.2 MHz and 10-30
MHz continuous. The antenna is at 100 feet above ground and was pointed at
Europe (roughly 045 degrees) during the measurements. The measurements were made
earlier this week, at around 8 PM, which is in medium twilight. The path over
the North Atlantic, of course, has been in darkness for several hours at this
hour. |
|
6.5 - 7.5 MHz band. Strongest signals are about -46 dBm. The
signal levels in the amateur band, however, are lower.
|
 |
| |
|
|
0 - 20 MHz. The strong signal at the left border is the spectrum analyzer's
local oscillator. The strongest signals are around 8 MHz and measure -32 dBm.
|
 |
|
|
|
I don't consider my station and antenna as ranking near the top of the
league, but I believe it ranks as "above average."
Later in the evening, signal levels
may increase, of course. I also sense that with the demise of the Cold War,
shortwave signal signal strength levels have significantly dropped in the
eastern US. Radio Moscow, for example, used to consistently provide
S-meter-pinning signals on several frequencies in the 7 MHz band. Radio
Havana would offer similar signal levels. It's been a long time since I've
seen those stations push the S-meter against the peg.
So, what significance does this have for you? If you are not a receiver
designer, it may help you appreciate the job done by receiver designers in
building a product that lets you extract a weak CW signal (maybe at -130 dBm)
whilst simultaneously handling signals 100 dB stronger on nearby frequencies.
And, if a similar measurement were made in the eastern US with a
super-contest antenna system, at peak propagation hours, the measured 7 MHz
signal levels would probably be in the -10 dBm range, or a more. That's a
LOT of signal strength, and at that level designers have to worry about things
like non-linearity in inductors used for filters, for example.
The ARRL measured Elecraft's K2's dynamic range, which is a measure of how
well the receiver section does at separating a weak desired signal from a nearby
strong signal, at roughly 126 dB at 20 KHz spacing, dropping to 115 dB at narrow
spacing. The received 3rd order intermodulation dynamc range is -96 dB to -66 dB
at close spacing. The measured signal level plots should help you interpret how
these numbers apply to real world signal levels.
A signal level of 0.3 uV (pretty weak signal and probably below the noise
level unless you have a good, low noise QTH) is -117 dBm. Hence, you should not
see dynamic range problems with a K2 unless the interfering signal is +10 dBm
(-2 dBm for close frequency spacing.) This is, of course, a simplistic analysis,
and you must consider the effect of multiple strong signals (3rd order intercept
is an important performance measure here) and other effects. |
|
|
|
16 August 2006
Stan, W5EWA, is a beta tester and reports that his Keyspan model USA-19HS
USB-to-serial adapter works well with the Z90 prototype. I've added this model
to the FAQ. I also
found Keyspan makes a USB adapter with four serial ports. This may be useful for
controlling multiple devices with a single adapter unit. I've added a link to
Keyspan's site at the FAQ. |
|
|
|
|
|
15 August 2006
I've added a new page describing how to measure (a) carrier suppression,
(b) unwanted sideband suppression and (c) transmitted intermodulation distortion
using the Z90, a coupler (such as Telepostinc's
LP100 wattmeter coupler) and a
two-tone generator. Click here to go to the
page. In addition, you should read the related page
IMD Measurements. I've been asked to explain why, when using an Elecraft K2, some bands
result in an "inverted" display, where higher frequencies display to the left of
the center line. I've added a lengthy FAQ
to address this point. I've mentioned it in the
Operations Manual,
but additional information may be helpful in understanding why this occurs.
Incidentally, inversion is not limited to the K2; the high IF output
(40.455 MHz and 45 MHz, for example) of many commercial and military grade
receivers is also inverted.
I've considered adding a "normal/inverted" option to the Z90-Control
software, and I may do so. However, since the K2's normal/inverted status
changes band-to-band, a switch may be less useful.
I've also made two
more illustrative screen captures from my HP8558B spectrum analyzer. |
This is a normal analog TV signal. At the left is the visual carrier and at
the right is the aural carrier. They are spaced 4.5 MHz. The color burst
subcarrier (3.58 MHz above the visual carrier) can be seen at 1 division to
the right of the center. The visual signal is amplitude modulated on the
visual carrier while the audio signal is frequency modulated on the aural
carrier.
Note that the signal energy is far from uniformly distributed over the 6
MHz TV channel.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
The digital TV signal, in contrast, spreads its energy nearly equally
across the entire 6 MHz TV channel. The spike at the left edge is the pilot
carrier.
|
 |
|
|
|
14 August 2006
I've added an FAQ discussion
concerning adding your callsign to the Z90's display and to the Z90-Control
software's display. The short answer is that you will be able to customize
both with your callsign, but that part of the firmware and Z90-Control
software isn't in place yet.
I've been working with Stan, W5EWA, to test the prototype K2 interface board.
Stan completed building and installing
K2 Interfacethe
modified prototype yesterday and I've expanded the K2 Interface page to
reflect Stan's test installation and to discuss
design changes in the interface board. Stan's testing confirms the basic
design works well, but we continue to discuss the optimum physical location
for the signal exit and the buffer amplifier board location. A minimal K2, of
course, is no problem, as there are ample extra holes in the rear panel and
plenty of room inside. As you add options to your K2, however, space becomes
more of a premium and the extra holes on the rear panel fill up. Stan and I
are looking for a single solution that works even if you have every possible
K2 option installed and still meets the quality consistent with the original
K2.
Incidentally, in the K2, the Z90/91 also display your transmitted
signal, since the K2 uses the same filters for transmit and receive.
|
|
Here's a photo of the Z90's screen connected to Stan's K2, tuned to the 40
meter band. The signals are shortwave broadcast stations.
|
 |
|
|
|
The prototype buffer amplifier installed in Stan's K2. The input coax and
power is at the bottom of the photo, and the output coax is at the right
center.The prototype has been modified to introduce frequency
shaping. The reasons for this and the builder's options are discussed on the
K2 Interface page.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
A couple years ago, I built a simple PIC circuit and associated firmware and
Windows software to read the auxiliary output signals from my 1970's vintage HP
8558B and 8557A spectrum analyzers and display the results via a Windows
program. I wrote the firmware in a combination of MBasic
and assembler for a 16F876A running with a 20 MHz clock. The Windows
display software was in Microsoft Visual Basic for NET.
I wanted to update both the firmware and display software so that I can
capture and publish spectrum analyzer sweeps when I work with the K2 buffer
amplifier performance verification work I plan to undertake in September. Rather
than revise my old work, I decided to start fresh with an 18F2420 PIC and
Swordfish and write a new
Windows display program based on the Z90-Control software.
The Swordfish compiler continues to impress me with its speed. With an
18F2420 running at 40 MHz (10 MHz resonator and 4X multiplier engaged),
Swordfish will execute a 10-bit ADC read and store the result into a 256 element
word array in about 27 microseconds. Swordfish's speed means that I did not need
any assembler code as a 100% Swordfish version more than meets my speed
requirements.
Here are a few images captured with my HP 8558B spectrum analyzer using
the 18F2420 PIC and the new Windows display software. It's connected to a
25-1300 MHz discone antenna at 75 feet above ground. To improve the spectrum
analyzer's noise figure, I've added a Gali-74 broadband amplifier between the
discone and the HP8558B. The 18F2420 firmware captures 256 samples with 10-bit
resolution and outputs the data via a serial port. The firmware automatically
adjusts the sample interval as the user changes the span control and adjusts the
analog video filter control.
|
|
Here's the narrowband FM weather station operated by NOAA in Manassas, VA.
The signals below the main signal are other NOAA weather stations at 162.400
MHz (Baltimore MD) and 162.475 MHz (Haggerstown MD).
|
 |
|
|
|
|
The FM broadcast band, 88.0 to 108.0 MHz. Lots of strong signals are seen
here near Washington D.C.
|
 |
|
|
|
WAMU-FM, an educational FM broadcast station operating with digital
subcarriers. The signal to the left is an educational station at 88.1 MHz
(probably WYPR-FM in Baltimore or possibly WYPF in Frederick MD) and the
one at the right is an educational station at 88.9 MHz (WVEP in Martinsburg
WV).
WAMU divides its 96 kb/s digital subcarrier into a 64 kb/s channel and a
32 kb/s channel.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
This is WETA-FM, another educational FM broadcast station. You can see the
19 KHz stereo pilot beacons and the analog subcarrier signals (talking books,
I believe).
|
 |
|
|
|
|
09 August 2006
|
|
I mentioned that I was working on a re-design of the Z90's front panel
hardware to avoid screws or an appliqué. I've finished a pair of prototype
struts that seem feasible. They are machined from 0.5" square Delrin or
Nylon 6/6 material. (I made both Delrin and Nylon versions. Delrin is easier
to machine.) |
 |
| |
|
| The struts run along the top and bottom and are held in place by the
screws that retain the front panel to the side rails. I'll have to make a
few changes in the front panel dimensions and also revise the soft key PCB
to fit the new arrangement, but the outside appearance of the Z90 should be
improved by removing the eight flat head screws shown in the prototype
photographs. The front panel installs normally, and is flush
against the front face of the upper and lower struts. |
 |
| |
|
| I've been recently asked about using the Z90-Control
software with computers without a hardware RS-232 port. I've added a
discussion to the FAQ
summarizing my experience with two different USB-to-serial adapters. |
| |
|
06 August 2006
I've recently had an extended E-mail discussion with one of the beta
testers about what should be seen on a Z90, what the resolution bandwidth, span,
dwell and skip factors are and how they interact. The "Quick
Operating Instructions" provide some information on this subject, but it's
worthy of more detailed examination. It's far to complex to make it a simple FAQ
answer, so I've added a new page Display to address
these topics. Take a look at it.
05 August 2006
I've joined the K2 community. Or, to be more precise, I will soon join the
K2 community. Since 90% of prospective Z90 purchasers own Elecraft K2
transceivers, it make sense for me to have one for testing purposes. (And, I
have a few other ideas for accessories that might be of interest to K2 owners.)
I don't have time to both build a K2 and keep the Z90 schedule I've
committed to, so my K2 will be built by Frank, W6NEK. I've seen photos of
Frank's work on both K2s and other kits and his craftsmanship is first class.
His charges for assembly are extremely modest, considering the time involved.
Along the K2 line, I've finished assembling a prototype K2 Buffer
Amplifier board from the PCBs I received on 03 August. The board layout works
and I'll send a test kit, along with the draft Assembly and Operating Manual, to
Stan, W5EWA, when the post office opens this morning. I'll incorporate his
comments into the next revision. I also have some ideas that I would like to
incorporate into the K2 Buffer Amplifier, but those tests will wait until late
August when I receive the K2 from Frank.
I'm also contemplating making the Buffer Amplifier kits available early
(say sometime in September) so that they may be built, installed and tested
prior to receiving the Z90/91 kits. If this is of interest to anyone, please
drop me an E-mail message. There's also some utility in having a buffered IF
output available for other purposes, such as looking at the waveform envelope
with an oscilloscope. However, there's a difference between the optimum IF
tap-off point for a panadapter connection and for IF envelope viewing. The
panadapter connection must be ahead of the receiver's selective stages, but for
envelope viewing, the connection is better made after selectivity. Otherwise,
the oscilloscope will display a mix of the desired signal, all the other signals
coming down your antenna, local oscillator feed through and a variety of
mixing products. In some rare cases, signal levels may work out to make this
usable for an envelope view of a particular signal, but don't count on it.
If you are interested in an envelope view, it is possible to install a second
Buffer Amplifier, after the receiver's selective filtering. This is the
approach taken in most professional receivers; they offer both a wideband panadapter-compatible buffered 1st IF output and a second post-filter, post-AGC
buffered output.
I've also signed up for the Elecraft Reflector (you can read the archives
at
http://www.elecraft.com/elist.html ) and look forward to my K2 experience.
I've ordered my K2 with the 100 watt amplifier, SSB and noise blanker options,
as I believe that should be representative of the most commonly owned options.
I've added a new page to the site,
Surface Mount Assembly, an extract from the draft Buffer Amplifier Assembly
and Operations manual, that relates the techniques I've found to work for me in
installing surface mount components. I make no claim that these are the only
procedures that work, or that these are the best procedures. They work for me,
but if you have a different approach that works for you, I wouldn't change it.
03 August 2006
In order to keep the Updates page manageable, I've decided to monthly
archive the prior month's material. To read a prior month's Updates page, click
on the corresponding button at the top of this page.
In the last couple weeks, I've received several E-mail messages with
questions about the project. Since some of these questions and my answers may be
of broader interest, I've reformatted the correspondence and placed it on the
FAQ page.
I should receive the new design K2 Buffer Amplifier printed circuit boards
today. I've completed a draft manual (28 pages, and I never thought there was
that much to say about a rather simple circuit) . I'll post the manual after I
complete a test build of the new layout and after Stan, W5EWA, has a chance to
build a second prototype and critique the manual. Since Stan owns a K2 and I
don't (I suppose that I should own a K2 and probably will in the not too distant
future) I will rely upon his comments for what works and doesn't work in the K2
installation.
A few prospective purchasers are interested in an assembled unit. Dario,
N5QVF, has said he is willing to assemble Z90's and Z91's and I'll post his
price list and contact information on the Pricing and Ordering Page soon. One of
the FAQ's discusses the "degree of difficulty" in assembling the kit. I'm a bit
handicapped in accurately assessing this, as I've now assembled four complete
PCBs in various prototype designs, which biases my ability to approach
construction from the prospect of a first time builder. Hence, my answer to this
blends my views and Dario's experience in the independent Z91 assembly.
I've not been happy with the Z90's prototype front panel, as it has eight
4-40 flat head black oxide machine screws to hold the switch board and LCD in
place. I much prefer a clean front panel, with, at most, the four corner screws.
There are several alternatives to achieve a clean front panel, such as spot
welded 4-40 studs through covering the current design with a Lexan surfaced
appliqué. With a volume measured in a couple dozen units, none of these are
ideal solutions. I've decided to work on a different approach, with an internal
support arrangement. If my current idea works, I'll post a photo or two. If it
does not, then I'll revisit other alternatives.
|