|
Home Updates Prior Products - no longer available Documents Book Modulation Loads Lattice Crystal Filter IMD Measurements Using LP100 Coupler Prototyping Software Updates K2 Measurements Oscillator Noise Measurements Bypassing Capacitor Voltage Change K2 Freq Stability Cohn Crystal Filter Receiver AGC Curves K2 RX Sensitivity Canned Osc Phase Noise K2 Interface K2 Filter Surface Mount Assembly TL750L Low Dropout Regulator Swordfish DDS Swordfish GLCD Module Bessel Nulls AM Modulation Z10000 with FT-920 Z100 Tuning Aid Dayton 2007 Softrock Lite 6.2 Header Adapter Carbon Composition Resistors Thermometers Hakko FT-800 Thermal Wire Stripper Heat Sinks Diode Turn-On Time Bill Hewlett and his Magic Lamp Tektronix P6022 Current Probe 1N400x Diode Family Forward Voltage Temperature Chamber Diode Vf vs If Ferrite Transformers 6 dB Hybrid Combiner Type 43 Ferrite B-H Curve K3 IF Bandpass Filter Estimating Q of Ferrite Cores Z10000 Buffer Amp Z10010 Bandpass Filter Using Softrock as a Panadapter for the K2 Signal Generator Phase Noise & Elecraft K2 Audio Transformer Data and Modeling Measuring 60 Hz Frequency Compact Fluorescent Lamp Z10000-U Buffer Amp and FT-1000MP WJ-8617B Receiver Impressions Weather in Clifton VA Radio Intelligence Example Diodes for RF Probes PIC Development Boards and Programmers Elecraft K3 and Panadapters Elecraft K3 AGC and S-Meter Elecraft K3 Noise Blanker and Crystal/DSP Filtering Jackson Harbor Press VLF Converter Elecraft K3 Receive Audio Headphone Impedance
| |
Measuring AM
Modulation with a Z90 or Z91
|
|
|
|
AM Modulation Review
Amplitude Modulation, or AM, varies the strength, or amplitude, of the radio
frequency carrier signal with the modulating frequency.
If we look at the composite signal in the time domain (plotting
voltage versus time) we see the traditional waveform as shown below.
|
|
30% AM modulated signal, time domain view. (Horizontal axis
time, vertical axis amplitude)
|
 |
If we look at the composite signal in the frequency domain (plotting voltage
versus frequency) we see a different view of the same signal.
|
|
30% AM modulated signal, frequency domain view. (Horizontal
axis frequency, vertical axis amplitude)
|
 |
We may measure the percentage modulation using data from either the time domain
or frequency domain.
|
|
In the time domain:
|
|

|
 |
|
Emax and Emin are in the same units, volts or millivolts most
commonly. |
|
In the frequency domain:
|
|

|
 |
Esideband and Ecarrier are in decibels above or below a reference level in this
formula, most commonly dBm, i.e., decibels above or below 1 milliwatt.
However, since the formula uses only the difference between two dB referenced
values, we may use any reference level and hence an instrument such as the Z90
which is not normally calibrated in terms of absolute levels.
Usually, if the modulation percentage is relatively high, say
30% or greater, the time domain approach will give the best accuracy. For low
modulation percentages, 30% and less, the frequency domain approach has greater
potential accuracy.
Let's work through a couple of examples. |
|
|
|
Time Domain Example
First, let's consider a signal modulated 30% with a 1 KHz
sine wave, using the signal generator's modulation percentage meter to set the
level. In this case, the signal source is a Boonton 102D signal generator.
In the time domain, using an oscilloscope we see a signal
similar to that shown below.
|
|
 |
Using the Tektronix TDS430 oscilloscope's built-in
measurement facilities, we determine Emax and Emin as:
Emax = 240 mV
Emin = 135 mVWe then
calculate the modulation percentage:

The measured modulation is quite close to the signal
generator's 30% setting.
Frequency Domain Example
Let's try a frequency domain measurement. Here's the same 30% modulated signal,
viewed in the frequency domain with a Z90.
|
|
 |
The difference between the carrier and the two modulation sidebands seems to be
about 20 dB. We can then calculate the modulation percentage based on this
difference:

This is not nearly as accurate as our envelope (time
domain) measurement. Why? Because an error of only one or two dB in measuring
the difference between the carrier and side band levels causes a relatively
large error.
Low Percentage Modulation
Let's look at a more difficult case, 5% modulation. As you
can see, accurately measuring the peak and trough of the modulated waveform will
be difficult, particularly with an analog oscilloscope without on-screen
measurement cursors.
|
|
 |
|
Using the TDS430A's cursor measurement functions, I
determined Emax = 197 mV and Emin = 179 mV, and computed the modulation
percentage as 4.8%. Looking at the same signal in
the time domain with the Z90 shows the modulating sidebands are considerably
lower than the carrier. |
|
|
|
 |
I measured the difference between the carrier and modulating sidebands as 52 dB.
Using this value, we can determine the modulation percentage as 5.01%.
Detecting Incidental FM
One final observation that we may make much easier in the
frequency domain is to determine if the signal generator has simultaneous AM and
FM modulation. Almost all signal generators before the era of phase lock and DDS
techniques have some degree of incidental frequency modulation that occurs
simultaneously with the desired amplitude modulation. Simultaneous AM and low
level incidental FM will reveal itself in different amplitude of the upper and
lower sidebands.
To illustrate this, I intentionally simultaneously
modulated my Boonton 102D signal generator with 1 KHz, setting the AM level at
30% and FM level corresponding to a deviation of 100 Hz. This is a low
amount of FM, but it shows up as a quite noticeable difference between the upper
and lower sidebands. You will note a very small difference between the two
sidebands in the 5% AM modulation as well, perhaps 1 dB or so. This is the
result of a very small unwanted simultaneous AM and FM modulation.
|
|
 |
|
|
|