|
Home Updates Prior Products - no longer available Documents Book Modulation Loads Lattice Crystal Filter IMD Measurements Using LP100 Coupler Prototyping Software Updates K2 Measurements Oscillator Noise Measurements Bypassing Capacitor Voltage Change K2 Freq Stability Cohn Crystal Filter Receiver AGC Curves K2 RX Sensitivity Canned Osc Phase Noise K2 Interface K2 Filter Surface Mount Assembly TL750L Low Dropout Regulator Swordfish DDS Swordfish GLCD Module Bessel Nulls AM Modulation Z10000 with FT-920 Z100 Tuning Aid Dayton 2007 Softrock Lite 6.2 Header Adapter Carbon Composition Resistors Thermometers Hakko FT-800 Thermal Wire Stripper Heat Sinks Diode Turn-On Time Bill Hewlett and his Magic Lamp Tektronix P6022 Current Probe 1N400x Diode Family Forward Voltage Temperature Chamber Diode Vf vs If Ferrite Transformers 6 dB Hybrid Combiner Type 43 Ferrite B-H Curve K3 IF Bandpass Filter Estimating Q of Ferrite Cores Z10000 Buffer Amp Z10010 Bandpass Filter Using Softrock as a Panadapter for the K2 Signal Generator Phase Noise & Elecraft K2 Audio Transformer Data and Modeling Measuring 60 Hz Frequency Compact Fluorescent Lamp Z10000-U Buffer Amp and FT-1000MP WJ-8617B Receiver Impressions Weather in Clifton VA Radio Intelligence Example Diodes for RF Probes PIC Development Boards and Programmers Elecraft K3 and Panadapters Elecraft K3 AGC and S-Meter Elecraft K3 Noise Blanker and Crystal/DSP Filtering Jackson Harbor Press VLF Converter Elecraft K3 Receive Audio Headphone Impedance
| |
|
|
|
Bill Hewlett and his Magic Lamp
As anyone with an interest in historical electronics
knows, Hewlett Packard's breakthrough product was the 200A audio oscillator,
with its first sales in 1938. Although other audio oscillators were available in
the market, the 200A had two significant advantages:
First, it provided 10:1 frequency tuning for each range;
and
Second, it was amplitude stabilized and with very low distortion.
William "Bill" Hewlett's 1942 patent on these inventions
can be read at the following link
http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/abouthp/histnfacts/museum/earlyinstruments/0002/other/0002patent.pdf
More interesting, however, is the October 1939 Proceedings
of the IRE article he co-authored with Fred Terman, Some Applications of
Negative Feedback with Particular Reference to Laboratory Equipment which
may be read at the following link:
http://www.hparchive.com/Manuals/HP-200-IRE-Article.pdf. Figure 10 of this
article and the associated text succinctly develops the theory behind the 200A,
and its successor instruments, such as the 200CD oscillator. (My first piece of
non-Heathkit test equipment was an HP200CD that I purchased new in June 1969. I
can't find the invoice, but the list price was $250, and I'm sure I did not
qualify for a quantity discount! At the time, $250 was a couple of weeks of my
salary as a research assistant / grad student in electrical engineering at Wayne
State University.)
The remainder of this page is devoted to lamp stabilization, but a quick
mention of the 10:1 tuning range of these oscillators is worth a quick mention.
The resonant frequency of an LC circuit is:
|
 |
|
ω is the resonant frequency in radians/sec. In units
more common for us as radio amateurs: |
 |
where f is the frequency in Hz, L is inductance in Henries and C is capacitance
in FaradsStandard variable capacitors seldom have
a tuning range much over 10:1, measured as maximum capacity / minimum capacity.
Since the resonant frequency is inversely proportional to the square root of
capacitance, a variable capacitor with a 10:1 max:min ratio allows a frequency
tuning range of square root (10) or just over 3:1. It goes without saying,
perhaps, that a laboratory audio oscillator variable over a 10:1 frequency range
without band changing is preferable to one offering only a 3:1 tuning range. |
 |
|
In Bill Hewlett's 200A oscillator circuit, which is
essentially identical with the above, the relationship between frequency of
oscillation and the tuning resistance and capacitance is: |
 |
|
In the most useful form, the two resistors,
R1 and R2 are equal in value, as are the two tuning capacitors, C1 and C2 and
thus the above equation has only R1 and C1 values. (If you look carefully at the
200CD schematic shown later on this page, however, you will see that C1 = 2*C2
and R1=0.5*R2. The 2x and 0.5x relationships cancel and result in the same
performance as in the case where R1=R2 and C1=C2.)
Of critical importance, of course, is that
the oscillator frequency is no longer related to the tuning capacitance by a
square root. Rather, it's a direct inverse relationship. Hence, if the tuning
capacitor has a 10:1 range, the oscillator likewise has a 10:1 tuning range.
Each band on my 200CD, in fact, has a range exceeding 12:1, e.g., on the
lowest band, one sweep of the dial takes the frequency from about 4.8 Hz to 65
Hz.
How does this circuit work to sustain
oscillation? The output of the second stage pentode is fed back to the first
stage grid. Since there's 180 degree phase shift in each amplification stage,
the net phase shift from the output stage to point "a" is 360 degrees. If,
therefore the RC network R1/C1/R2/C2 has zero additional phase shift at a
particular frequency, we have met one of the two Barkhausen criteria for
oscillation; phase shift is an integral multiple of 360 degrees. (The second
criterion is that the net gain >= 1 at the oscillation frequency. We can satisfy
this by selecting component values and, of course, the negative gain
stabilization feedback provided by lamp R3, as discussed below.)
The figure below shows the phase and amplitude shift at the center of the RC
network, point "b" in the above schematic, generated with LTspice. The
component values are C1=C2=1000 pF and R1=R2=159.16K, computed for 1000 Hz
oscillation. As the analysis shows, at 1000 Hz, the net phase is zero degrees.
(Don't pay attention to the amplitude value, as I have not normalized it for the
simulation values. The shape of the amplitude curve, however, is correct.)
Hence, at only one frequency is the total phase shift, from output stage plate
to input stage grid, equal to 360 degrees. And, by adjusting C1 & C2, that
frequency is easily shiftable. |
 |
|
|
|
Now, back to amplitude stabilization via an
incandescent lamp feedback element ...
First, from the Barkhausen criteria, oscillation is sustained if
the net gain is at least 1. However, if an explicit mechanism to control gain is
not provided, the oscillations will increase in amplitude until a stage
saturates, not a desirable condition for an oscillator designed to produce low
distortion. And, we cannot reliably depend upon component choice to provide
exactly the right gain, as variations in plate voltage, tube gain, component
drift, etc. all may work to drop the gain below 1.0, stopping oscillations, or
increase it into saturation. And, for a wide frequency range of oscillation,
these problems are compounded. Hence, the oscillator designer must incorporate
an explicit gain stabilizer into the design.
Amplitude stabilization in the 200A and other HP
oscillators is accomplished through a particularly elegant use of an
incandescent lamp as a feedback element. Consider the circuit below, taken from
a 1951 instruction manual for the 200A oscillator. This circuit, with limited
change, can be found in several of HP's commercial oscillators.
|
 |
|
R7 is a 3 watt, 120V incandescent lamp, which serves as a
cathode resistor, from which V1's grid bias is derived. If V1's plate/cathode
current increases, the current through R7 increases. This current increase heats
the lamp's tungsten filament, thereby causing the lamp's resistance to increase.
This results in an increase in the voltage drop across the lamp, which makes
V1's grid bias go further negative. However, taking V1's grid more negative
decreases V1's plate current. Thus, the lamp stabilizes V1's current and thus
the oscillator's signal level. Likewise, a decrease in plate current works to
decrease V1's negative bias, which then increases the plate current, again a
self-restoring arrangement. With the 200CD, HP made
a major revision to its audio oscillator design, as can be seen in the circuit
fragment below. For our amplitude feedback purposes, note that the 200CD uses
two series lamps, R13 and R14, 10 watt rating at 250 volts. The lamps have
across them the AC signal voltage produced by the oscillator. R11 and R12
provide a level adjustment mechanism when the lamps are replaced. |
 |
This feedback mechanism is a bit more complex than in the
200A, and may be best understood by a more abstract view of the circuit,
presented below. This circuit is from the April-June 1960
Hewlett Packard Journal article The Effect of
μ-Circuit Non-Linearity on the Amplitude Stability of RC Oscillators,
available here
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/pdfs/IssuePDFs/1960-04.pdf.
|
|
This HPJ article has a detailed analysis of the oscillator
and amplitude control through negative feedback with lamps and is well worth
reading. |
 |
|
Amplifier μ is a differential amplifier, with an output
signal E=μ(Eb-Ea). (The 200CD is a differential amplifier design, as may be seen
in the circuit fragment above.) R1 is the lamp and R2 is a feedback setting
resistor forming a voltage divider with R1. If the
oscillator output increases, Eb increases. Also, the lamp, R1, will increase in
resistance thereby disproportionally increasing voltage Ea. Since the amplifier
output is proportional to Eb-Ea, R1 introduces a stabilizing element, as Ea
increases proportionally more than Eb.
|
|
I've made measurements today of the 10 watt, 250 V lamp used
in the 200CD.. The figure below shows my measured data (black line) and a fifth
order polynomial fit to the data. This data is taken with an automated
measurement system, employing an HP6038A system power supply, an HP3456A digital
multimeter and an Agilent 34410A digital multimeter, all controlled via a GPIB
bus with a Prologix controller card. The software is home made, running in
Liberty Basic. |
 |
|
Note that I've only taken the data over the range of 0 to 10
V, even though this is a 250 V lamp. That's because when used in a feedback loop
in the 200CD, the lamp sees very limited voltage across it, a small fraction of
the rated 250 volts. But, where on this curve should
the designer place the lamp's operating point? It turns out that the most
desirable operating point is where the change in lamp resistance is maximum for
a change in voltage--thereby providing the maximum negative feedback effect. In
other words, the designer will select the point at where the derivative of the
resistance versus voltage curve is a maximum. The figure below plots this
derivative, showing both the derivative of the measured data (black) and the
derivative of the curve-fitted 5th order polynomial (red curve). Strictly
speaking, these are not derivatives but rather differentials, as they are
computed by taking numerical differences between measured values, but we'll
ignore the difference. The noise spikes in the measured data are artifacts in
the measured data. It's better to look at it as a smoothed curve and ignore the
noise spikes.
The data shows the most sensitive part of the 10 watt /
250 V lamp is at about 2 volts, although the there is not too much change in the
derivative over the range of 1 volt to 5 volts. In fact, the 200A schematic
fragment shows 3.2 volts DC across the lamp. However, the 200A's lamp is not the
one measured and, of course, the cathode has an signal frequency AC component as
well. (The bypass capacitor C7, appears to be a small value capacitor intended
to boost high frequency performance.) |
 |
|
|
|
If we plot the lamp resistance
over the same range as a function of applied power, as suggested in the HPJ
article, we see two linear ranges.
The first range, with the blue line extension is close to a zero temperature
coefficient resistor. There's so little power in this range (less than 0.5 milliwatt) that the filament temperature changes very little as the power
changes. At around 5 milliwatts, the resistance picks up a second log-log linear
relationship. |
 |
|
I'm not going to go through the math, but this relationship
is a combination of the tungsten filament change in resistance with increasing
temperature, modified by the power loss due to radiation (temperature to the 4th
power) and conduction. |
|
I don't have the 3 watt lamp used in the 200A oscillator, but I did
pick up a 4 watt 120 volt "nightlight" lamp and collected the data presented
below for it. |
 |
|
Looking at the differentials (change in resistance / change
in voltage) for the 4 watt lamp, we see that it is not nearly as suitable for a
stabilization element as the 10 watt / 250 lamp used in the 200CD. There is no
area where the differential is relatively constant. |
 |
|